![](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125640303/744187118.jpg)
FlashArcade.com is your online source for the best free online flash games including, and much more. You can play free games on FlashArcade.com any time! Whatever kind of game you feel like playing you can find it on FlashArcade.com.If you like arcade games like the popular Dinner Dash game or tower defense games like Azgard Tower Defense and Front Line Tower Defence you can find them on FlashArcade.com. Maybe your favorite flash games are Shooting Games. You can even play First Person Shooters like the World War 2 game. Maybe you are a fan of the popular iPhone and Android games like Angry Birds.
You can find them on FlashArcade.com. Whatever your skill level, we have hot new games added daily. Our games are provided by some of the best flash game developers including Armor Games, Games2Win, ToonGames and Addicting Games! Ready to start playing?
Duels Defense is a free game which can be played at towerdefence.biz. This game have been rated from administrators of towerdefence.biz with 4.60 stars out of 5. I suggest you a flash game:Duels Defense.
Choose from the following categories:, &. Or you can choose from the FlashArcade.com, or.If you have a game that you would like to submit to FlashArcade.com simply use our form and we will check it out and if it looks good your game can be published on FlashArcade.com.
The Code Of Honor—A Duel In The Bois De Boulogne, Near Paris, wood-engraving after, (January 1875)A duel is an arranged engagement in combat between two people, with matched weapons, in accordance with agreed-upon. Duels in this form were chiefly practiced in with precedents in the medieval code of, and continued into the modern period (18th to late 19th centuries, if not beyond) especially among.During the 17th and 18th centuries (and earlier), duels were mostly fought with (the, and later the ), but beginning in the late 18th century in, duels were more commonly fought using.
And pistol duels continued to co-exist throughout the 19th century.The duel was based on a code of. Duels were fought not so much to kill the opponent as to gain 'satisfaction', that is, to restore one's honor by demonstrating a willingness to risk one's life for it, and as such the tradition of dueling was originally reserved for the male members of; however, in the modern era it extended to those of the generally. On occasion, duels with or swords were fought between women.Legislation against dueling goes back to the medieval period. The (1215) outlawed duels, and civil legislation in the against dueling was passed in the wake of the.From the early 17th century, duels became illegal in the countries where they were practiced.
Dueling largely fell out of favor in England by the mid-19th century and in by the turn of the 20th century. Dueling declined in the in the 19th century and by the time the broke out, dueling had begun to wane even in the. Public opinion, not legislation, caused the change. Commemorative poster for the fourth centennial of the Disfida di Barletta, the, fought on 13 February 1503 between 13 Italian and 13 French all shown wearing full.In society, the formal concept of a duel developed out of the and older pre-Christian practices such as the. In Medieval society, judicial duels were fought by knights and squires to end various disputes. Countries like, and practiced this tradition.
Judicial combat took two forms in medieval society, the feat of arms and chivalric combat. The feat of arms was used to settle hostilities between two large parties and supervised by a judge. The battle was fought as a result of a slight or challenge to one party's which could not be resolved by a court. Weapons were standardized and typical of a knight's armoury, for example longswords, polearms etc., however, weapon quality and augmentations were at the discretion of the knight, for example, a spiked hand guard or an extra grip for half-swording. The parties involved would wear their own armour; for example, one knight wearing full plate might face another wearing chain mail. The duel lasted until one party could no longer fight back.
In early cases, the defeated party was then executed. This type of duel soon evolved into the more, or 'passage of arms', a chivalric that evolved in the late 14th century and remained popular through the 15th century. A knight or group of knights ( tenans or 'holders') would stake out a travelled spot, such as a bridge or city gate, and let it be known that any other knight who wished to pass ( venans or 'comers') must first fight, or be disgraced. If a traveling venans did not have weapons or horse to meet the challenge, one might be provided, and if the venans chose not to fight, he would leave his spurs behind as a sign of humiliation. If a lady passed unescorted, she would leave behind a glove or scarf, to be rescued and returned to her by a future knight who passed that way.The was critical of dueling throughout medieval history, frowning both on the traditions of and on the duel on points of among the nobility.Judicial duels were deprecated by the of 1215, but the judicial duel persisted in the into the 15th century. The word duel comes from the Latin 'duellum', cognate with 'bellum', meaning 'war'.Renaissance & early modern Europe During the early, dueling established the status of a respectable and was an accepted manner to resolve disputes.
Dueling remained highly popular in European society, despite various attempts at banning the practice.The first published, or 'code of dueling', appeared in. The first formalized national code was 's, during the.By the 17th century, duelling had become regarded as a prerogative of the, throughout Europe, and attempts to discourage or suppress it generally failed. For example, King of outlawed dueling in 1626, a law which remained in force afterwards, and his successor intensified efforts to wipe out the duel. Despite these efforts, dueling continued unabated, and it is estimated that between 1685 and 1716, French officers fought 10,000 duels, leading to over 400 deaths.In, as late as 1777, a code of practice was drawn up for the regulation of duels, at the Summer in the town of,. A copy of the code, known as 'The twenty-six commandments', was to be kept in a gentleman's pistol case for reference should a dispute arise regarding procedure. Enlightenment-era opposition By the late 18th century, values began to influence society with new self-conscious ideas about, and new attitudes towards. The cultivated art of politeness demanded that there should be no outward displays of anger or violence, and the concept of honor became more personalized.By the 1770s the practice of dueling was increasingly coming under attack from many sections of enlightened society, as a violent relic of Europe's medieval past unsuited for modern life.
As England began to and benefit from urban planning and more effective, the culture of street violence in general began to slowly wane. The growing maintained their reputation with recourse to either bringing charges of, or to the fast-growing print media of the early 19th century, where they could defend their honor and resolve conflicts through correspondence in newspapers.Influential new intellectual trends at the turn of the 19th century bolstered the anti-dueling campaign; the of stressed that praiseworthy actions were exclusively restricted to those that maximize human welfare and happiness, and the notion of the 'Christian conscience' began to actively promote social activism. Individuals in the and similar societies, who had successfully campaigned for the, condemned dueling as ungodly violence and as an egocentric culture of honor. Modern history.
An anti-dueling sermon written by an acquaintance of.Dueling also began to be criticized in America in the late 18th century; denounced the practice as uselessly violent, and encouraged his officers to refuse challenges during the because he believed that the death by dueling of officers would have threatened the success of the war effort. However, the practice actually gained in popularity in the first half of the 19th century especially in the and on the lawless. Dueling began an irreversible decline in the aftermath of the. Even in the South, increasingly came to regard the practice as little more than bloodshed.Prominent 19th-century duels. The fictional pistol duel between and Vladimir Lensky. Watercolour by (1899)For a pistol duel, the two would typically start at a pre-agreed length of ground, which would be measured out by the seconds and marked, often with swords stuck in the ground (referred to as 'points').
At a given signal, often the dropping of a handkerchief, the principals could advance and fire at will. This latter system reduced the possibility of cheating, as neither principal had to trust the other not to turn too soon. Another system involved alternate shots being taken, beginning with the challenged firing first.
Many historical duels were prevented by the difficulty of arranging the 'methodus pugnandi'. In the instance of, the number of paces could not be agreed upon; and in the affair between and Ballow, one had determined never to fight in the morning, and the other that he would never fight in the afternoon., 'who did not stand upon ceremony in these little affairs,' when asked by how many times they were to fire, replied, 'just as often as your Lordship pleases; I have brought a bag of bullets and a flask of gunpowder.' Western traditions Europe Great Britain & Ireland The duel arrived at the end of the 16th century with the influx of Italian honor and courtesy literature – most notably 's (Book of the Courtier), published in 1528, and 's Il Duello, published in 1550. These stressed the need to protect one's reputation and social mask and prescribed the circumstances under which an insulted party should issue a challenge.The word duel was introduced in the 1590s, modelled after duellum (an archaic Latin form of bellum 'war', but associated by popular etymology with duo 'two', hence 'one-on-one combat').Soon domestic literature was being produced such as Simon Robson's The Courte of Ciuill Courtesie, published in 1577. Dueling was further propagated by the arrival of Italian fencing masters such as Rocco Bonetti and Vincento Saviolo. By the reign of dueling was well entrenched within a militarised peerage – one of the most important duels being that between and (later the 4th Earl of Dorset) in 1613, during which Bruce was killed.
James I encouraged as Solicitor-General to prosecute would-be duellists in the, leading to about two hundred prosecutions between 1603 and 1625. He also issued an edict against dueling in 1614 and is believed to have supported production of an anti-dueling tract by the. Dueling however, continued to spread out from the court, notably into the army. In the mid-17th century it was for a time checked by the activities of the Parliamentarians whose Articles of War specified the death penalty for would-be duellists. Nevertheless, dueling survived and increased markedly with the.
Among the difficulties of anti-dueling campaigners was that although monarchs uniformly proclaimed their general hostility to dueling, they were nevertheless very reluctant to see their own favourites punished. In 1712 both the and were killed in a induced by political rivalry and squabbles over an inheritance.By the 1780s, the values of the duel had spread into the broader and emerging society of gentlemen. Research shows that much the largest group of later duellists were military officers, followed by the young sons of the metropolitan elite (see Banks, A Polite Exchange of Bullets). Dueling was also popular for a time among doctors and, in particular, in the legal professions. Quantifying the number of duels in Britain is difficult, but there are about 1,000 attested between 1785 and 1845 with fatality rates at least 15% and probably somewhat higher. The last duel in England was fought in 1852 between two French political exiles.In 1777, at the Summer in the town of, a code of practice was drawn up for the regulation of duels. It was agreed by delegates from Tipperary, and, and intended for general adoption throughout.
An amended version known as 'The Irish Code of Honor', and consisting of 25 rules, was adopted in some parts of the United States. The first article of the code stated:Rule 1.—The first offence requires the apology, although the retort may have been more offensive than the insult.—Example: A. He is impertinent, &C.; B. Retorts, that he lies; yet A. Must make the first apology, because he gave the first offence, and then, (after one fire,) B.
May explain away the retort by subsequent apology.' The 19th-century Irish statesman took part in a duel in 1815. Following the death of his opponent, John D'Esterre, O'Connell repented and from that time wore a white glove on his right hand when attending as a public symbol of his regret. An Act for the punishing and preventing of Duelling, (1728) Massachusetts-Bay ColonyEuropean styles of dueling established themselves in the colonies of European states in North America. Duels were to challenge someone over a woman or to defend one's. In the US, dueling was used to deal with political differences and disputes and was the subject of an unsuccessful amendment to the United States Constitution in 1838. It was fairly common for politicians at that time in the United States to end disputes through duels, such as the and the.
Dueling has become outdated in the north since the early-19th century. Dueling in the US was not uncommon in the south and west, even after 1859, when 18 states outlawed it, but it became a thing of the past in the United States by the start of the 20th century. To this day, anyone sworn into any statewide or county office or judgeship in must declare under oath that he or she has not participated in, acted as a second or otherwise assisted in a duel.Historian said of dueling in the United States:Teenage duels were not uncommon, at least in. Three ironies emerged from the dueling custom.
First, though confined to a segment of the upper classes, dueling served essentially the same purpose as the lowest eye-gouging battle among hog drivers. Second, because of this congruence between upper and lower concepts of, dueling was not at all undemocratic. It enabled lesser men to enter, however imperfectly, the ranks of leaders, and allowed followers to manipulate leaders to their taste. Third, the promise of esteem and status that beckoned men to the field of honor did not always match the expectation, but often enough dueling served as a form of for unresolved personal problems.Physician has left us a chapter describing the dueling culture in 1830s South Carolina. Crude duels were also fought to uphold personal honor in the rural, that were partly influenced by the brought by Southern emigrants. The duel is a mythological aspect of a story in most, although real life Wild West duels did occur such as the. Gunfighters and became infamous for participating in at least two quick draw duels in their lifetimes.
Besides quick draw duels, more formal European duels were also fought in the Old West such as those participated by former. Duel between andDuels or niyuddha were held in ancient India (including modern-day Pakistan and Bangladesh) for various reasons. Many considered it shameful to die in bed, and in their old age often arranged for a yuddha-dhan, literally meaning 'combat charity'. According to this practice when a warrior felt he did not have much time to live, he would go along with a few attendants and ask another king for a duel or a small scale battle. In this way he chooses his own time and manner of death and is assured that he will die fighting.
Duels to the death were legal in some periods, and punishable by execution in others.Ancient epics and texts like the tell that duels took place under strict rules of conduct, and to violate them was both shameful and sinful. According to these rules, it was forbidden to injure or kill an opponent who has lost their weapon, who surrenders, or who has been knocked unconscious.
![Duels Duels](http://www.soft4everyone.com/images/blog/duels.jpg)
The tells that if a warrior's topknot comes loose during a duel, the opponent must give him time to bind his hair before continuing. Both duellists are required to wield the same weapon, and specific rules may have existed for each weapon. For example, the records that hitting below the waist is forbidden in mace duels. In one ancient form of dueling, two warriors wielded a knife in the right hand while their left hands were tied together.The Portuguese traveller tells that dueling was a common practice among the nobles of the, and it was the only legal manner in which 'murder' could be committed.
After fixing a day for the duel and getting permission from the king or minister, the duellists would arrive at the appointed field 'with great pleasure'. Duellists would wear no armour and were bare from the waist up. From the waist down they wore cotton cloth tightly round with many folds.
The weapons used for dueling were swords, shields and daggers which the king would appoint them of equal length. Judges decided what rewards would be given to duellists; the winner may even acquire the loser's estate.Duels in were first recorded in the Chainarol-Puya which details the ethics of dueling.
When a fighter was challenged, the day for the bout would be fixed to allow for time to prepare the weapons. Allowing the opponent the first chance to fire an arrow or hurl a spear was considered particularly courageous. The duel itself was not necessarily to the death, and usually ended once first blood has been drawn. However, the victor was still expected to behead the loser. Either before the duel or before the beheading, the fighters would share the meals and wine prepared by their wives. If it had been so requested beforehand, the loser's body may be cremated. Heads were taken as trophies, as was custom among the headhunters of northeast India.
Various taboos existed such as not killing an opponent who runs, begs or cries out of fear, or anyone who pleads for protection. In, duels known as were fought by the -trained caste on behalf of their local rulers. Indonesia Weapons and rules for dueling in the Indonesian archipelago vary from one culture to another.
In, dueling is known as carok and was typically practiced with the sickle. The imbued their sickles with a khodam, a type of mythical spirit, by a way of prayer before engaging in a duel.The traditional form of dueling among the - community was called sitobo lalang lipa in which the duellists fight in a.
The challenger stands with a loosened sarong around him and respectfully invites the other man to step into the sarong. The sarong itself is kept taut around both their waists. When both men are inside, an agreement to fight til death and thereafter shall be no hereditary grudge nor will any party be allowed to question the duel, shall be made.
If both fighters agree, they then engage each other within the confined space of a single sarong. Unlike the more typical duel of Javanese and Malay culture, the Bugis-Makassar community instead wield, the local single-edge knife. Because avoiding injury is near-impossible even for the victor, this type of duel was considered a sign of extraordinary bravery, masculinity and the warrior mentality. Although true sitobo lalang lipa are no longer practiced, enactments of these duels are still performed at cultural shows today.Japan.
Further information:Dueling has provided themes for numerous works of popular culture.Examples in films. (1926), with. (1934),. (1935), swords. (1937), swords. (1938), with duelling pistol. (1938), swords.
(1940), swords. (1940), swords.
(1943), which shows two main characters becoming friends after fighting a duel, the preparations for which are shown in great detail. In (1952), the climactic duel is reputed to be the longest in cinema at over six minutes. (1958), with dueling pistols. (1964-1966) with pistols using.
![](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125640303/744187118.jpg)